Choosing between two capable SUVs isn’t always straightforward, especially when they are built with different priorities in mind. The Mahindra Thar ROXX and the Tata Harrier cater to distinct types of buyers while still competing in a similar price range.
The Thar ROXX focuses on off-road capability and a rugged driving experience, making it suitable for those who prioritise adventure and terrain handling. On the other hand, the Harrier leans towards comfort, space, and everyday usability, offering a more refined experience for city and highway driving.
Both SUVs bring strong design, modern features, and performance suited to their purpose. The decision comes down to what you value more, off-road capability or on-road comfort.
Here’s a detailed comparison of the Mahindra Thar ROXX vs Tata Harrier, covering design, performance, features, and overall value.
Thar Roxx Vs Tata Harrier
Below are the key highlights for Thar Roxx and Tata Harrier:
| Basic Info | Mahindra Thar ROXX AX7L 4WD Diesel AT | Tata Harrier Fearless Plus Dark AT |
| Brand Name | Mahindra | Tata |
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 22.49 LakhGet On-Road Price | Rs. 25.89 LakhGet On-Road Price |
| Engine Displacement | 2184 cc | 1956 cc |
| Body Type | SUVAll SUV Cars | SUVAll SUV Cars |
| Max Power | 172bhp@3500rpm | 167.62bhp@3750rpm |
| No Of Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Gearbox | 6-Speed AT | 6-Speed |
| Drive Type | 4WD | FWD |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Mileage (ARAI) | 15.2 Kmpl | 16.8 Kmpl |
| Tyre Size | 255/60 R19 | 245/55/R19 |
| Boot Space | … | 445 Liters |
| Steering Mounted Audio Control | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Airbags | Driver, Passenger and Side Front | Driver, Passenger and Side Front |
| Insurance | Rs. 1.15 LakhThar ROXX Insurance | Rs. 1.29 LakhHarrier Insurance |
Thar Roxx Vs Tata Harrier Engine

Mentioned Below are the Thar Roxx Engine vs Tata Harrier:
| Particulars | Thar Roxx | Tata Harrier |
| Engine Type | 2.2L mHawk | Kryotec 2.0L |
| Engine Displacement | 2184 cc | 1956 cc |
| Max Power | 172bhp@3500rpm | 167.62bhp@3750rpm |
| Max Torque | 370Nm@1500-3000rpm | 350Nm@1750-2500rpm |
| Emission Norm Compliance | BS VI 2.0 | BS VI 2.0 |
| No Of Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Gearbox | 6-Speed AT | 6-Speed |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | FWD |
| Paddle Shift | —- | Yes |
| Turbo Charger | Yes | — |
| Drive Mode Types | No | — |
Harrier vs Roxx Price
The petrol Mahindra Thar Roxx has an ex-showroom pricing of ₹12.99 Lakh, while the fully-loaded petrol variant costs ₹19.99 Lakh. While the top-end Mahindra Thar Roxx Diesel model costs ₹22.49 Lakh, the base Diesel model costs ₹13.99 Lakh. However, the base variant of the Tata Harrier costs ₹16.19 Lakh in New Delhi, while the range-topping Diesel model costs ₹26.44 Lakh.
Also Read: Mahindra XUV 3XO vs Mahindra Thar Roxx vs Mahindra XUV400- Which One to Choose?
Thar Roxx vs Tata Harrier Performance
| Particulars | Thar Roxx | Tata Harrier |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 Liters | 50 Liters |
| Mileage (ARAI) | 15.2 Kmpl | 16.8 Kmpl |
Thar Roxx vs Harrier Mileage
| Feature | Mahindra Thar Roxx | Tata Harrier |
| Mileage (City) | N/A | 14.00 KM/L |
| Mileage (Highway) | N/A | 18.00 KM/L |
| Mileage (Combined) | N/A | 16.80 KM/L |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57.0 L | 50.0 L |
| Mahindra Thar Roxx | Tata Harrier | |
| Pros | The classic boxy SUV design is endearing and striking Both engines provide powerful performance and smooth driving. It is packed with equipment, including safety measures. There is plenty of cabin room, and the seats are cosy. | Large size, prominent location on the road. Excellent interior quality with a persona-based interior. Rich features list and tech package. Advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) capabilities that are user-friendly in India, as well as plenty of trunk space. |
| Cons | Even on clear roadways, body roll is noticeable due to the stiff ride quality. Occasionally the infotainment system might be unreliable. | Diesel engine could’ve been more refined. No petrol or all-wheel drive option. |
